delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <03a901c79238$63b293e0$0200a8c0@AMD2500> |
From: | "Aaron Gray" <angray AT beeb DOT net> |
To: | "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronpurpleleaf4 AT aaronwl DOT com> |
Cc: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org> |
References: | <2b2c01c78fa5$d94a27c0$0200a8c0 AT AMD2500> <01f001c78fc6$c916ce00$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DDE7F DOT 5010105 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <463EDE36 DOT 1020807 AT aaronwl DOT com> <005601c790b9$52c5e940$0200a8c0 AT AMD2500> <464178E3 DOT 10108 AT aaronwl DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Successful build of GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on latest Cygwin snapshot 20070427 |
Date: | Wed, 9 May 2007 13:48:48 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
> Aaron Gray wrote: > >>> One issue that might affect many some is that COM doesn't work. >>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27067> has a patch that >>> is pending review I guess, but probably won't go into 4.2. > >> Does this effect XPCOM meaning Mozilla and friends will not compile ? > > It is triggered anywhere multiple inheritance is combined with stdcall. > Since I believe XPCOM uses stdcall on Windows (but "cdecl" on other > targets), I believe the answer here is 'Yes, Mozilla will not compile.' But its fine on Unix platforms, that is good. I am not sure if MinGW will/is used to compile Mozilla on Windows anyway. > I think it's likely that mingw.org will include this fix in their own > releases of 4.2, which is probably a bad thing, as it makes the need to > get this fix into official GCC sources seem less urgent. A lot of GCC > patches for Windows-related issues tend to stall for a long time in this > state; I'm not really sure why. Yes, this is perplexing. Aaron -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |