| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <2b2c01c78fa5$d94a27c0$0200a8c0 AT AMD2500> <01f001c78fc6$c916ce00$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DDE7F DOT 5010105 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <022c01c78ff1$545f4ad0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DF64F DOT 2080109 AT aol DOT com> |
| Subject: | RE: Successful build of GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on latest Cygwin snapshot 20070427 |
| Date: | Sun, 6 May 2007 16:44:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <022e01c78ff5$5ed734b0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Office Outlook 11 |
| In-Reply-To: | <463DF64F.2080109@aol.com> |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 06 May 2007 16:38, Tim Prince wrote:
> dave DOT korn AT artimi
PCYM Tim, thanks
>> On 06 May 2007 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> [removed mailing lists other than cygwin]
>>>
>>> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>>> So don't anybody here on the cygwin list get too excited yet. <g>
>>
>> Didn't actually spot the cygwin list had been cc'd in at first, but yes,
>> I'm just helping test the upstream release, this is not going to turn into
>> a cygwin package in the immediate future.
>>
>
> Is it reasonable to assume, then, that gcc 4.3 has as much chance of
> becoming a cygwin package, and put some effort into cleaning that up for
> cygwin?
All this work has to go in on mainline as a matter of course. It will then
become part of whichever is the next release branch. There's next to no
chance of getting consent to back-port what is essentially new functionality
rather than regression fixes.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |