X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<15c45fbc0705020230u7c1645b7r7935256125838b80 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <f19peo$t43$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <813e5f920705020346j511cbe3dma46bb9ef2eff17f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <15c45fbc0705020434j82705d6sf45e7554c8780898 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <f19u9f$d03$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <15c45fbc0705030142l3fc289c1ncca5d813f1bda679 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <f1cgfp$2fm$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <007001c78d77$5c483850$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <15c45fbc0705030442g5b91a040wd79cdbd3b2cf80cc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <007701c78d79$305d5250$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <15c45fbc0705030457g63cefc22oda214c64e45eae4e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	RE: g++ doesn't work
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 13:04:23 +0100
Message-ID:	<007f01c78d7b$31c84210$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<15c45fbc0705030457g63cefc22oda214c64e45eae4e@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 03 May 2007 12:58, Darrell Blake wrote:

> On 5/3/07, Dave Korn <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT YOWWWWW> wrote:
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Please take care not to do that Darrell,
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR - I get enough spam as it is!


>>   What happens if you add the "-v" option to your compiler commandline?
> 
> Already tried that. Nothing immediately obvious seemed apparent.
> Here's the ouput:

  [snipped]

  That's truncated, there should be tonnes more output than that, and what I
think it shows is that the executable is failing in very early startup.  I
wonder if it's possible there's a missing dependency?  What does

cygcheck /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/cc1plus.exe

show?



    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -