X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2007 10:33:05 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request
Message-ID:	<20070501143305.GF17841@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<f137va$5ar$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20070501120623 DOT GA3824 AT tishler DOT net> <20070501133951 DOT GB17841 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <463747BC DOT 3050002 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <04ca01c78bfb$39c7b530$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<04ca01c78bfb$39c7b530$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Because python is a command interpreter,

>>Similarly, sh.exe
>
>I think these are two very strong arguments in favour.

python.exe isn't anything like the interactive shell that people use on
a day to day basis and simply stating that it is doesn't mean that it is.

The only reason that I can see for making a copy would be to support the
use of python in a .bat file.  Otherwise you could always just do
python<TAB> from the command line.

>I note that we already (appear to?) do the same for perl.

Ok.  I agree that is an argument in favor since I don't recall many complaints
about perl.  It is a simple copy though, AFAICT.  I've registered my objections
now and I'll leave the decision to the maintainer.

>(/me remembers back to the insane gyrations I had to go through a
>couple of years ago when I had to setup makefiles for my clients who
>wanted to invoke them from cmd.exe using --win32 and have them work on
>systems that could have either cygwin python or active python or both
>and they could come in any order in the path....  <shudder>)

This isn't really relevant to the discussion since the cygwin version of
make wouldn't have any problem with symlinks.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -