| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <17190 DOT 86623 DOT qm AT web59108 DOT mail DOT re1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <007501c7860c$fc385bf0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <ba40711f0704231914r13469e77y7ed032a387ae63d2 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| Subject: | RE: newlib?: pow function can produce incorrect results. |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:23:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <007f01c78617$94644ec0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Office Outlook 11 |
| In-Reply-To: | <ba40711f0704231914r13469e77y7ed032a387ae63d2@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 24 April 2007 03:14, Lev Bishop wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 24 April 2007 00:53, Cary R. wrote:
>>
>>> I had some more time to look into this and when the
>>> simple C program I mentioned earlier uses variables
>>> like the other program, incorrect results are
>>> produced. I have attached this C/C++ program. I
>>> certainly don't understand what is going on. I would
>>> have expected pow to be pass-by value which should
>>> make the two calls identical from a system standpoint,
>>> but the results imply something different. Any
>>> suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>> The notorious PR323.
>
> Nah, in this case it's just that gcc's __builtin_pow() is more
> standards-compliant than newlib's pow().
Yeh, after a second reading through the assembly I figure you're right.
Maybe I should sleep every now and againzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |