X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<ba40711f0704231914r13469e77y7ed032a387ae63d2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:14:17 -0400
From:	"Lev Bishop" <lev DOT bishop AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: newlib?: pow function can produce incorrect results.
In-Reply-To:	<007501c7860c$fc385bf0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<17190 DOT 86623 DOT qm AT web59108 DOT mail DOT re1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <007501c7860c$fc385bf0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 4/23/07, Dave Korn  wrote:
> On 24 April 2007 00:53, Cary R. wrote:
>
> > I had some more time to look into this and when the
> > simple C program I mentioned earlier uses variables
> > like the other program, incorrect results are
> > produced. I have attached this C/C++ program. I
> > certainly don't understand what is going on. I would
> > have expected pow to be pass-by value which should
> > make the two calls identical from a system standpoint,
> > but the results imply something different. Any
> > suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>   The notorious PR323.

Nah, in this case it's just that gcc's __builtin_pow() is more
standards-compliant than newlib's pow().

L

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -