Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/03/16/12:53:48
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:49:10PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:46:21AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>Or should I just build the kernel unstripped using cygwin-1.5.24-2-src,
>>>and debug against that?
>>
>>Corinna has been responsible for the last few cygwin 1.5.2x releases and
>>she has a different way of generating a release than mine. It's
>>possible that the .dbg file isn't working right or created correctly.
>
>This seems to be the case. I finished a build of cygwin-1.5.24-2 (with
>CFLAGS="-g -O0") but
>
> (1) the build process seems automatically to strip the dll, and
>produce a detached .dbg file.
>
> (2) I got the similar behavior using my .dll/.dbg combo as I got with
>the "official" pair from 1.5.24-2: popups -- but then insight died on
>me. FWIW, my .dbg file is much smaller than the official one: 350k vs.
>9.5M.
>
>Is it even possible anymore to create an "old-style" debugging
>cygwin1.dll, with integrated rather than detached debug symbols?
No.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -