X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<45F7E50D.90909@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:05:33 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: graphical took kit
References:	<195b3f1f0703131856o4a422011m22b1e8e5b1b49dab AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<195b3f1f0703131856o4a422011m22b1e8e5b1b49dab@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Wynfield Henman wrote:
> Re: GTK+
> 
> Me and many people have had problems with cygwin's gtk+ library.
> I am thankful to all who have made it possible to have gtk+ functionality.
> However, I (and I believe many others) have run into a problem.
> 
> The gist of it is that "memalign" needs to be handled specially as
> cygwin does with "malloc".
> 
> I don't know how to direct this to, but I would appreciate information
> regarding this apparent problem.
> 
>> > The GTK+ build with Cygwin is still broken, unfortunately.
>> > One way of solving that would be to .....
>> > treat memalign specially as they do (cygwin) with malloc.
> 
> 
> Thanks for any input..

<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-02/msg00469.html>
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-02/msg00510.html>

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -