delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/03/12/13:59:14

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <45F5A2E6.2050608@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:58:46 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: when to use a ln or a mount
References: <Xns98F17521F7E4Bzzappergmailcom AT 80 DOT 91 DOT 229 DOT 5> <et3sqe$vdc$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <Xns98F1BC97A3D77zzappergmailcom AT 80 DOT 91 DOT 229 DOT 5>
In-Reply-To: <Xns98F1BC97A3D77zzappergmailcom@80.91.229.5>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

zzapper wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> wrote in
> news:et3sqe$vdc$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org: 
> 
>> zzapper wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> In my confused mind ln and mount seem to achieve the same thing.
>>> In my case I want to have an easy to type path(s) to my old pc
>>>
>>> so I typed:-
>>>
>>> mount -f -u -b "//dell25/c/" "/o"
>>>
>>> but I also successfully tested
>>>
>>> ln -s //dell25/c/ /old
> 
>> In this case, what you are doing is effective to mounting a remote file 
>> system, so "mount" would be traditional (and also your only choice on 
>> most UNIX's, which don't understand UNC paths). However, as you've 
>> noticed, either one works on Cygwin. :-)
>>
> 
> Do either test if connection valid?

Valid?  No.  "mount" checks that the destination exists.  That's all.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019