X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<45F4E74D.7020700@cheshirelaw.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:38:21 -0700
From:	"Geoffrey T. Cheshire" <gtc AT cheshirelaw DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problem with ruby and cygssl-0.9.8.dll
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall Wrote:

 > Oh I agree.  You definitely shouldn't take a route that produced a fix
 > for you once already.  Using it again is just asking for trouble. ;-)

 > Use 'rebaseall' as you did before.  It generally fixes the problem and
 > is the right solution.

I guess the wink means you're not just being sarcastic and unhelpful.

It seems to me rebaseall is not the best solution long-term, though it 
does work as an immediate fix.  The issue is well stated here:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-10/msg00873.html

Geoff

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -