X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:39:35 -0500
From:	alex <alex AT zoosmart DOT us>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: a better socketpair
Message-ID:	<20070309013935.GA11276@zoosmart.us>
References:	<20070308223950 DOT GK14344 AT cantrip DOT org> <20070308235215 DOT GB7745 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070309002047 DOT GL14344 AT cantrip DOT org> <20070309003308 DOT GA9357 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20070309003308.GA9357@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Spam-Score:	-4.398 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME
X-Bayes-Score:	0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I found something about pipes in the rel notes for 1.5.20-1 at

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2006-07/msg00000.html

looks like they work.

I found a brief mention of socketpair at
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-api/std-misc.html#AEN107

and more here about sockets and select

http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/highlights.html#ov-hi-sockets

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:33:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:20:47PM -0800, Nathan Myers wrote:
> >Hi Christopher,
> >
> >Thank you for your quick reply.  I understand that this code might 
> >not ultimately be useful to cygwin.  It continues to work in my 
> >project, so I'm not put out.  
> >
> >I wonder, though, do you know if it might be useful to Mingw?
> >I.e., might it be worth offering to them, or do you know of a
> >reason why not to bother?
> >
> >As a side note, Google finds lots of complaints about pipes not being
> >usefully selectable for writing in cygwin.  Has that been fixed already?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -