Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/03/06/08:19:01
On Mar 6 06:00, Eric Blake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There is currently a thread on bug-gnulib about adding GNU tool support
> for platforms that support st_birthtime in addition to st_atime, st_mtime,
> and st_ctime. Since Windows has a notion of birthtime (in fact, since
> Windows calls their birthtime attribute a 'creation time', leading to
> several people's confusion over what ctime really means), is it worth
> cygwin 1.7 adding st_birthtime support?
I don't know if it's actually worth the effort, but it would be easily
supportable in struct stat, given that we have spare room in struct stat
of exactly the size of a timestruc_t, afaics. But, still, does it
really make sense? How long will it take until st_birthtime will go
into the standards, if at all?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -