X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<17393e3e0703021032uf7ff36fidc85bbb4e6234e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:32:47 -0500
From:	"Matt Wozniski" <godlygeek AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: script problem
In-Reply-To:	<002301c75cf7$db499aa0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<es7s8k$698$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <490598 DOT 58712 DOT qm AT web37206 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <002301c75cf7$db499aa0$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/2/07, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Actually the advantages tend to go the other way at this point.  The Cygwin
> non-X rxvt is no longer being actively maintained upstream.  rxvt-unicode is
> being actively maintained both upstream and here in Cygwinton.  It looks
> nicer (fonts appear to get antialising), there's bugfixes (though I've only
> ever run into one minor bug on the non-X rxvt), and has some Unicode/UTF-8
> support if that's important to you.

And, xterm has extremely good unicode support.  If unicode support is
important to you, then right now xterm provides more support than the
cygwin rxvt-unicode.

~Matt

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -