X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<45DC68B1.6090605@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:43:45 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: FW: Re: [emacs_user AT hotmail DOT com: ***MEMORY-ERROR***: emacs[5172]: GSlice: failed
References:	<45D9678E DOT 7090108 AT swipnet DOT se> <45DA98EF DOT 6040205 AT swipnet DOT se> <45DB2A13 DOT 6070606 AT swipnet DOT se> <45DC1AAD DOT 5050109 AT swipnet DOT se>
In-Reply-To:	<45DC1AAD.5050109@swipnet.se>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Jan Djärv wrote:
> Larry Hall wrote:
>  > Jan D. wrote:
>> > It seems that when Emacs defines its own malloc and friends, memalign
>> > returns ENOSYS. But emacs defines its own memalign as well. 
>> Shouldn't that
>> > one be called?
>>
>>
>> Seems like it though it sounds like something that would be controlled by
>> the emacs configure script to me.
>>
> 
> I don't follow.  How can the Emacs configure script make sure the Emacs 
> supplied memalign is called by glib?


Ah, sorry.  I missed that you were referring to glib.  I agree that there
should be some consistency here.  Perhaps things would work better if Emacs
used none of it's own m* implementations.  That's just a WAG.  I really
have no experience with the Emacs code base.  But it does sound to me like
this would be Emacs configurable at least. ;-)


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -