delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Cesar Strauss <cestrauss AT gmail DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: ls output still truncated |
Date: | Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:48:24 -0200 |
Lines: | 42 |
Message-ID: | <erfqb7$oaj$1@sea.gmane.org> |
References: | <erfe79$avu$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) |
In-Reply-To: | <erfe79$avu$1@sea.gmane.org> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Note-from-DJ: | This may be spam |
Chuck wrote: > Folks I could really use some help here. I still cannot get the ls > command to work reliably. It worked for years and about two weeks ago > started sputtering. I have completely unstalled all cygwin packages, > deleted the directories, and reinstalled from scratch. Even just > installing the bare mimimum packages and running a bash shell without X > or even a .profile, ls still fails to output anything 50% of the time. > > One other observation I've made is there's a similar program named > "dir.exe" in the /usr/bin directory. It seems to do pretty much the same > thing as ls. In fact the file sizes and timestamps are even the same. It > works every time. I could just alias ls=/usr/bin/dir but that seems more > like a work-around rather than fixing the real problem. Can anyone help > with this? TIA > > Interesting fact that dir.exe works and ls.exe does not. Inspecting the source, the one and only difference between the two is: -- ls-ls.c begin -- #include "ls.h" int ls_mode = LS_LS; -- ls-ls.c end -- -- ls-dir.c begin -- #include "ls.h" int ls_mode = LS_MULTI_COL; -- ls-dir.c end -- For all purposes, they should behave exactly the same, except for the output format. It's a shot in the dark, but could you try: 1) Copy ls.exe to myls.exe and run it as myls.exe. Does it still fails? 2) Does ls -l also fails? 3) Does vdir.exe fails? Do you have antivirus or webcam software running? They are known for causing random problems in Cygwin apps. Cesar -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |