Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/02/19/02:51:22
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:26:36AM +0100, Jan Dj??rv wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>If someone is positing that one of several functions possibly isn't
>>working in cygwin why not report exactly which function that would be?
>>I.e., a little more work than reposting speculation would be
>>appreciated.
>
>I did that comment, it is not speculation. I currently have no W32
>machine, hence no cygwin at all.
So if you have no way to verify anything then it sounds like it would be
speculation by definition. Speculation isn't a bad word but speculating
doesn't actually do any good until someone can confirm the speculation.
Since I doubt that anyone here is going to download emacs to satisfy a
speculation that cygwin's API is broken, we obviously need more details
from people who care about this.
i.e.:
>I don't know how the original poster configured Gtk+, I don't know
>which version of cygwin he/she has, I don't know which version of Gtk+
>he/she has. I only tried to find out if Emacs could fix this somehow,
>which it can't. If the original poster (emacs_user AT hotmail DOT com) can
>send in his/hers config.h from the Gtk+ configuration, we can figure
>out what function we are talking about.
So, basically you're saying "a little more work" is required.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -