Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/02/17/09:32:12
Brian Dessent wrote:
> First, a note: tetex-base and tetex-tiny are meant to be mutually
> exclusive: you should install one or the other but not both.
I did not knew this.
In any case, this does not seem excluded completely from setup.ini
(or .hint):
1) there is 'ec-fonts-mftraced' that depend on -tiny;
2) also 'tetex' depend on -tiny and ldesc says
"...This virtual tetex package will install tetex-bin and tetex-tiny,
the minimal working teTeX setup. It is advised to install tetex-base
too. If you have plenty of bandwith, find the rest of teTeX in
tetex-extra and tetex-doc."
So I am confused: to install TeTeX completely, which package should be
selected and which NO?
Should we 'ping' the TeTeX maintainer?
> All three of tetex-tiny,extra,base own the file
> /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh.
When I saw the same postinstall to be included in more than a package, I
suspected that something was wrong.
Now with your dettailed explanation, more things are enlightened.
Thanks,
Angelo.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -