| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> |
| Subject: | Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc. |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:11:06 -0600 |
| Lines: | 18 |
| Message-ID: | <eqagbr$f3k$1@sea.gmane.org> |
| References: | <020d01c748b4$62d8b170$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <45C69F2F DOT 2060300 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0702052348340 DOT 28605 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <eqacah$tma$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0702061215200 DOT 28605 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <Pine.GSO.4.63.0702061215200.28605@access1.cims.nyu.edu> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> ...but doesn't the script itself involve a fork? On a big project, with >> an extra fork for every source file, that can still add up. > > Don't forget that invoking the gcc executable from make or the shell > involves a fork anyway. If gcc is 'exec'ed from the script, there will > only be the fork that invokes the shell, versus the fork that would have > invoked the executable. Hmm, ok, I was never convinced that bash's exec builtin didn't still involve fork()ing. Now I am (having taken a closer look at it). -- Matthew HIPPOS feel unacknowledged. HIPPOS get angry. > PRAISE HIPPOS HIPPOS seem somewhat placated. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |