X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 1 Feb 2007 02:16:48 -0800
From:	Christopher Layne <clayne AT anodized DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
Message-ID:	<20070201101648.GD25688@ns1.anodized.com>
References:	<20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob:	0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted:	Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From:	clayne AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com
X-Assp-Intended-For:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:13:37AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> When I was maintaining cygwin's gcc, I often thought about eliminating
> -mno-cygwin and just providing a pure mingw cross compiler in the
> distribution.  I really don't know why it wasn't done that way to begin
> with.  I have vague recollections of arguing for this when -mno-cygwin
> was first introduced by Geoff Noer but apparently I wasn't very
> persuasive.
> 
> I know that this will probably be another "Death of Cygwin predicted"

Fine by me. Can we slip in removing text mounts at the same time? ;)

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -