X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:00:57 -0600
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<epqi09$nr8$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <45C0971E DOT 4080305 AT byu DOT net> <20070131132700 DOT GA3478 AT implementation DOT labri DOT fr> <20070131133102 DOT GA17405 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070131134842 DOT GU27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <050901c74547$76f60e20$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070131154054 DOT GC19137 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <17393e3e0701310808s2e8e77d9t638d0e90a83c3ecb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <epqg4d$h8d$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20070131163221 DOT GD19137 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To:	<20070131163221.GD19137@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:29:01AM -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Matt Wozniski wrote:
>>> Before simply ripping out support for it, how about just adding a
>>> message to gcc so that when passed "-mnocygwin" on the command line, it
>>> warns that it's deprecated and will be removed in the near future,
>>> before processing?
>> ...and add a REALLY BIG MESSAGE that, if something breaks, the person to 
>> complain to is the package maintainer and not the Cygwin ML. :-)
> 
> No, if something breaks then the user has to fix it.

I was responding to Corinna's comment "there are many projects out there 
which build environment requires `gcc -mno-cygwin' to work". Maybe these 
are all 'in-house' things? What I meant was to complain to the person 
who decided to use -mno-cygwin and not to us. :-)

Sorry if that wasn't clear.

-- 
Matthew
OFFICER throws a tear gas grenade at you. You start to feel nauseous. 
You need fresh air quickly.
 > OPEN WINDOWS
Sorry, I have a philosophical objection to Microsoft products.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -