delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/01/31/11:32:42

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:32:21 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
Message-ID: <20070131163221.GD19137@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <45C0971E DOT 4080305 AT byu DOT net> <20070131132700 DOT GA3478 AT implementation DOT labri DOT fr> <20070131133102 DOT GA17405 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070131134842 DOT GU27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <050901c74547$76f60e20$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070131154054 DOT GC19137 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <17393e3e0701310808s2e8e77d9t638d0e90a83c3ecb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <epqg4d$h8d$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <epqg4d$h8d$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:29:01AM -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>Matt Wozniski wrote:
>>Before simply ripping out support for it, how about just adding a
>>message to gcc so that when passed "-mnocygwin" on the command line, it
>>warns that it's deprecated and will be removed in the near future,
>>before processing?
>
>...and add a REALLY BIG MESSAGE that, if something breaks, the person to 
>complain to is the package maintainer and not the Cygwin ML. :-)

No, if something breaks then the user has to fix it.

I don't mind adding a deprecated feature but I think some kind of
optional wrapper script eliminates the need.

And, I really think that we should consider adding some kind of way
to warn people about these issues in setup.exe.  I've always thought that
it should be somehow possible for packages to open dialog boxes.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019