X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0701311015180 DOT 3176 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:08 -0000
Message-ID:	<051f01c74553$d20a4900$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.CYG.4.58.0701311015180.3176@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 31 January 2007 16:19, Brian Ford wrote:

> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
>> If we REALLY wanted to preserve -mno-cygwin, we could do so as a shell
>> script wrapper for gcc but, personally, I think I'd rather just tell
>> people to use the cross-compiler.
> 
> Why not just alias -mno-cygwin to -b i686-mingw?


  Because it always works better to invoke the real driver than to try and
play -B/-V games....  :)


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -