delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/01/31/05:52:07

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:51:40 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Perl bug?
Message-ID: <20070131105140.GQ27843@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20070122181727 DOT GC27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1552 DOT 67 DOT 40 DOT 28 DOT 188 DOT 1169493973 DOT squirrel AT 67 DOT 40 DOT 28 DOT 188> <20070122202137 DOT GC20665 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <45B540FF DOT 6060101 AT x-ray DOT at> <20070123083753 DOT GE27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <45B62E0B DOT 4080500 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz> <45BBCF84 DOT 7070409 AT x-ray DOT at> <20070128120735 DOT GK27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4903 DOT 67 DOT 42 DOT 100 DOT 49 DOT 1170014267 DOT squirrel AT 67 DOT 42 DOT 100 DOT 49>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4903.67.42.100.49.1170014267.squirrel@67.42.100.49>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan 28 11:57, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Thanks for the info.  It's interesting to know.  What I still don't get,
> > however, is the fact that the same statement does not waste memory on
> > the x86 Linux Perl 5.8.5, but does on the x86 Cygwin Perl 5.8.7 and the
> > x86_64 Linux 5.8.8.  So it has been introduced only in later versions?
> > And why is it defended?  It doesn't seem to make sense, rather on the
> > contrary.
> 
> This behaviour hasn't changed that I know of.  I verified that a 5.8.5
> cygwin perl behaves the same way.  Could you confirm your x86 Linux
> Perl 5.8.5 results again, and send me (privately if you wish) the
> output of: perl -MConfig=config_sh -we'print config_sh' from that
> perl?

I just ran the testcase under strace on the Linux box again and to my
surprise it behaved identical to the Cygwin and the 64 bit Linux
version, as you say.  What have I done wrong in my first tests?  Was I
hallucinating, caffein-induced maybe?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019