Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/01/30/10:57:54
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:12:02AM -0800, Glenn Serre wrote:
>Good morning,
>
>Lev Bishop wrote:
>>On 1/30/07, Glenn Serre wrote:
>>>I have no working patch, I was going to use this problem as an
>>>opportunity for
>>>my first attempt to build and debug the cygwin DLL (while maybe even
>>>charging a
>>>client for it) but it looked to me as if it may already be being
>>>addressed.
>>>Looking again, I see that this might not be that case, so I'll see
>>>what I can do
>>>(no promises, as I'm a newbie at cygwin development).
>>
>>In cases like this, a generally useful thing you can do is to go try
>>snapshots from
>>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>and try to figure out between which 2 versions the problem first
>>appeared. If you post the reult of this to the list, then someone can
>>often fix it easily, but if you wanted to have a go yourself, you can
>>look at the changelogs for that snapshot and frequently it will be
>>obvious which change was to blame.
>
>
>The 2006-12-11 version of cygwin1.dll has the problem.
>The 2006-12-05 version does not.
>
>I don't see an obvious smoking gun in the changelog (I haven't even looked
>at the code yet) but there do seem to be candidates.
Could you send a non-creatively edited strace here?
Breaking it down to the shortest possible test case would help, i.e., if
bash -c "/bin/pwd; /bin/pwd" causes the problem that would be helpful since
we wouldn't have to wade through tons of irrelevant strace output.
OTOH, if it has to be an interactive bash script, don't try to edit out
what you think are irrelevant parts of the strace. Just send the whole
thing.
If it is long then please bzip2 compress it before sending.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -