delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:38:21 +0100 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: ln -s exe magic (coreutils 6.7-2) |
Message-ID: | <20070124143821.GQ27843@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <011701c73f43$3d07d270$3e0010ac AT wirelessworld DOT airvananet DOT com> <20070124043651 DOT GF25379 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <20070124094810 DOT GN27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <45B76311 DOT 1000009 AT byu DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <45B76311.1000009@byu.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Jan 24 06:45, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Corinna Vinschen on 1/24/2007 2:48 AM: > > This looks rather like a problem with the exe magic in coreutils. FWIW, > > I never liked the idea to create "foo.exe.lnk" symlinks. They only slow > > down the symlink processing in Cygwin. > > Should we get rid of the special processing in cygwin 1.7.0? > [...] > I'm having a tough time thinking of any scenarios that will break in a new > installation if we drop .exe.lnk support; and I'm only slightly worried > that existing cases, such as Pierre's example of /usr/sbin/sendmail.lnk > vs. /usr/sbin/sendmail.exe.lnk, tripping up users. I would be in favor of I appreciate the idea to remove it, but I have long ago already convinced myself that we will have problems removing it. A quick look into /bin on my machine, which has basically a standard install of roughly 30-40% of the available packages in the distro, shows that existing installs have a non-marginal number of .exe.lnk files: $ find /bin -type l | grep \\.exe /bin/awk.exe /bin/c++.exe /bin/captoinfo.exe /bin/cc.exe /bin/csh.exe /bin/etags.exe /bin/f77.exe /bin/flex++.exe /bin/gunzip.exe /bin/i686-pc-cygwin-c++.exe /bin/i686-pc-cygwin-g++.exe /bin/i686-pc-cygwin-gcc.exe /bin/infotocap.exe /bin/manpath.exe /bin/red.exe /bin/reset.exe /bin/rtin.exe /bin/tclsh.exe /bin/wish.exe /bin/zcat.exe Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |