Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/01/13/12:39:45
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:29:18AM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:25:08AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Jan 13 00:22, Christopher Layne wrote:
>>>The real question I have is why was what *should* have worked, not
>>>working?
>>
>>That has been answered immediately in the replies:
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00093.html
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00095.html
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00097.html
>>
>
>Okay, I'll file this under "looks like this is it, so it's probably
>it."
>
>A little less snark - a little more acceptance and understanding goes a
>long way.
You could also file it under "In a long running discussion, reading
responses and asking for specific clarification is better than just
asking general questions which seem to imply that you haven't been
paying attention."
YMMV.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -