X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:53:30 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: NTSEC documentation
Message-ID:	<20070108135330.GA23638@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20070108101835 DOT GA23069 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <023f01c73320$96617d50$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<023f01c73320$96617d50$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan  8 12:29, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 08 January 2007 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > Is anybody here with a developer background, who likes writing
> > documentation?
> > 
> > If so, would this person be interested in revamping the NTSEC
> > documentation with my input?  It shows its age, my lacking knowledge of
> > the english language and it's also very strangly ordered.
> 
>   I've got some spare tuits coming up, I can do that.  Got some notes/to-dos?

Oh cool, thanks!

I have some vague notes for a start:

- I wrote the NTSEC doc "going with the flow".  There are pointers to
  how things worked in 1.0 or changes made in Cygwin 1.1 or 1.3, which
  just don't make sense anymore.  One goal would be to rip these old
  version cruft out and give the document a structure more to the point
  how things actually work now, not how they worked 5 years ago.

- Same for the artificial difference between the chapters "New setuid
  concept" and "Switching User Context" which just doesn't make sense
  anymore.  There are two ways to switch user context, with and without
  external token and that's what should be said.

- Same for mentions of sexec which has been deprecated and ripped out
  five years ago.

- There's a bug in the "File permissions" chapter, third paragraph.
  The write_sd function doesn't use BackupRead, it used to use
  BackupWrite and then again, it doesn't use this function anymore,
  but instead the native NT call NtSetSecurityObject.

- The names of functions should be set as <command>func</command>,
  not by using single quotes.

- You could fix some bad wording resp. bad usage of SGML as you see fit.

Other than that, bug me in PM if you think something's maybe not correct
anymore.


Thanks in advance, I really appreciate that!
Corinna


-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -