X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<20061216042837.3934.qmail@web61011.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:28:37 -0800 (PST)
From:	Rick Rankin <rick DOT rankin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: xemacs-21.4.20-2/xemacs-tags-21.4.20-2/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.20-2
To:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id kBG4Snrc010556

----- Original Message ----
From: Charles Wilson <xxx AT yyy>
To: xxx AT yyy
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 8:55:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: xemacs-21.4.20-2/xemacs-tags-21.4.20-2/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.20-2

>Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> A new version of 'xemacs' has been uploaded to a server near you.
>>     * Fix: xpm no-X builds were broken on cygwin with /bin/gcc.
>
>Was this a libXpm-noX deficiency, or something else?

Chuck,





This was a patch I posted to the XEmacs list that was required due to
the library name change (libXpm.dll.a --> libXpm-noX.dll.a). I
/almost/ posted a question here about it (i.e., was the name change
intentional), but quickly realized that Cygwin package maintainers
never do anything unintentional, so I just hit 'delete' instead of 'send'.



>
>>     * Fix: Support renamed xpm no-X library under cygwin.
>
>Whoops.  I meant to include compatibility link/import libraries but I 
>forgot: e.g.
>   /usr/lib/noX/libXpm.dll.a -> /usr/lib/noX/libXpm-noX.dll.a
>
>However, now that xemacs has already adapted to the new name, AND xemacs 
>is the only known user of this library, I wonder if it is worth it to 
>release a new version with those compatibility links, now?
>


FWIW, I don't think the compatibility links are necessary if XEmacs is the only package using it.






--Rick








--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -