X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:27:22 -0500
From:	Jean-Claude Gervais <jc DOT gervais AT videotron DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: A regrettable oversight
In-reply-to:	<20061215144842.GD3889@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<1166196442.16409.7.camel@mercury.sprymusic>
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Evolution 2.8.2.1
References:	<035101c72032$07894a00$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0612150836080 DOT 26827 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <20061215135533 DOT GA3889 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0612150920530 DOT 26827 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <20061215144842 DOT GD3889 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I have to chime in here;
Originally, I became curious about Linux BECAUSE of Cygwin.
As I experimented more and more with Cygwin, I became really impressed
with how it was able to support quite a lot of Linux apps at the source
level will relatively little trouble. The trouble and care the Cygwin
developers have gone to to emulate a real *nix environment on something
as backwards as Windows is truly amazing. A feat hidden from view, like
all great software engineering, of course, but tremendous nonetheless.

Of course digging around *nix via Cygwin ends up being so interesting
that you end up thinking things like "Why is Windows so retarded?" and
eventually the pull of Linux becomes irresistable.

So I eventually switched to Linux, again, because of Cygwin.
I think that that might even be one if Cygwin's unstated goals.

Thank you, devs.

J
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 09:48 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If Cygwin can't adapt to Microsoft innovation then maybe we should all
> either be moving to Linux or MinGW.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -