X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<813e5f920612141419i717e223ds38d20b03ab137a70@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:19:52 +1100
From:	"Hugh McMaster" <dasjournal AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin slower on one computer
In-Reply-To:	<45804D3A.6060602@algonet.se>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<45804D3A DOT 6060602 AT algonet DOT se>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Magnus,

Have you tried enabling the large Windows memory cache option?  This
should increase your Cygwin compile time immensely.  The build time is
also related, as you know, to what else is taking CPU time.

Hugh

On 14/12/06, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why Cygwin build things so much slower on one
> computer I have. We're talking about more than 3 times slower on a
> computer that ought to be a bit faster (Athlon64 at 2.2-2.4 GHz,
> compared to a  Pentium M at 1.8 GHz).

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -