delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/12/11/15:29:16

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-Id: <1165867445.8902.279942097@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: "Charles Wilson" <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
References: <1165851287 DOT 32453 DOT 279885173 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com>
Subject: Re: pcre, C++
In-Reply-To: <1165851287.32453.279885173@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:04:05 -0500
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave said:

> This is most likely the passing-empty-strings-across-dll-boundaries 
> problem aka PR24196; would you care to install the experimental 
> gcc-3.4.4-2 and see if it fixes the problem?

Why, yes, it does; thank you.  (I shoulda remembered that...) 
Unfortunately, this is not a solution for me (yet) because:

RE: Problems with GCC-3.4.4-2 (exp) ?
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00512.html
(debugging symbols/specs file?)

and

"RE: Status of gcc 3.4.4-2"
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-09/msg00269.html
(specifically: "...but I'll have to roll a fresh package to fix a couple
of bugs
that showed up")

and

"RE: Requesting an updated gcc-mingw-g++ package to match
gcc-g++-3.4.4-2 (PR24196)"
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-10/msg00220.html

(OT: it appears that the mingw project does not have ANY releases that
incorporate this fix; looks like I'll have to roll my own for THAT
environment.)

--
Chuck


P.S.  It's my understanding that this change (to std::string) would
constitute an ABI change of the underlying C++/STL runtime library on
cygwin.  Thus, any C++ packages -- or at least, those that are NOT
compiled with -nostdlib -- would have to be recompiled (and version
bumped?) once a g++ with this change was promoted to curr:  Right?

Fortunately, there aren't many of these: libncurses++, xerces, groff,
and the various octave stuff is all that comes to mind -- and octave
already requires binary clients to use g++-3.4.4-2 IIRC.  Oh, and pcre's
libpcrepp. <g>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019