X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<195b3f1f0612042118p13b145e0n4c1daf0f3eb0d50c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:18:37 +0900
From:	"Wynfield Henman" <wynfield AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gpgme
In-Reply-To:	<4573FB9F.D22C44F6@dessent.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<195b3f1f0612040149s453fbcf5s46a98d757dbed7fc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4573FB9F DOT D22C44F6 AT dessent DOT net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/4/06, Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net> wrote:
> Did you really need to start a new thread for this?

Two issues where mentioned, which you apparently missed.

> Wynfield Henman wrote:
>
> > I saw the reference to "gpgme" with some misleading (to me) version
> > number, such as 1.1.2, tacked on and said it was in ...somewhere like
> > ../cygwin/ports. ......
>
> Cygwin Ports is a separate project.  Type it into Google and follow the
> first hit.  It's off-topic for this list because it has its own mailing
> list.
Are you saying that "cygwin ports" are not ports of software to run on cygin?


> > guess cygwin rules/convention requires a different numbering system???
> Um, no.  Have you even looked at the gpgme ftp site?
Yes and it is as I stated. Now answer why the cygwin ports located
gpgme is label as version 1.2.0 when no such official version exists?

> ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gpgme/
Yes you can verify that the latest release is 1.0.3  NOT  1.2.xx

> You need to add the URL to setup.exe if you want to use it.  Again, it's
> not part of the official Cygwin project.
You're unclear here.  Do you mean that setup.exe is not inherently
related to cygwin?
Or that adding a URL to setup.exe is not.  Though it seems it should
be, if software is otherwise not available, (yet listed as a cygwin
port).
> Brian

Wynfield

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -