X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:01:32 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin + make 10 time slower than equivalent linux make (same ifc compiler)
Message-ID:	<20061202160132.GC643@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<mn DOT 12c37d6cb7b95ded DOT 65710 AT esi-group DOT com> <ekrmof$jhk$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<ekrmof$jhk$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:06:57PM +0100, Eric Lilja wrote:
>Philippe Conraux skrev:
>>I have to build a large project on Windows.
>>
>>Build libraries using Intel compilers needs 12 hours on cygwin
>>when same build needs 1 hour on Linux (same computer : dual boot, same 
>>compilers ifc 9.1)
>>
>>Equivalent build using Visual-Studio seems faster (not yet real measures)
>>
>>Is it a known issue with a fix?
>
>Sure, just recompile the cygwin.dll yourself with line 42 commented
>out.

Sigh.  This has changed in 1.5.22.  It is now line 47.

Keep up with the program, people!

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -