X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:42:27 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions
Message-ID:	<20061125024227.GA23140@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0611232157150 DOT 29731-100000 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it> <20061123214345 DOT GC32515 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <umz6h6kp7 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20061124182241 DOT GA24422 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <u8xi07kvj DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<u8xi07kvj.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:36:00PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:22:42 -0500
>>From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
>>
>>Wow.  Nice way to escalate the issue.
>>
>>http://www.google.com/search?q=define:human+readable&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition
>>
>>If you look at a output of a stackdump file, it is obviously human
>>readable.  It is an ascii file which has English words in it.  It was
>>NOT clear to me that the OP had actually looked at it.
>
>Others obviously did understand that; you could look at the previous
>messages in the thread to find their wisdom, before you posted yours.
>
>You are not exactly a newbie in the world of mailing lists and public
>discussion forums, so I'd expect you to know how this is done.
>
>But even if you didn't or couldn't, just asking for more details would
>be the Right Thing to do.
>
>The ``cat'' reply, OTOH, can be nothing but an attempt to ridicule
>someone who asked for your help, no matter how you look at it.  No
>amount of misunderstanding could ever possibly explain away such a
>response.
>
>>There is a difference between the term "human readable" and "I do not
>>understand what the numbers mean".  If the OP had said something along
>>the lines of "I see a lot of hexadecimal numbers but I don't know what
>>they are", then that would have clarified the situation.
>>
>>But, this kind of response to a one sentence reply is clearly over the
>>top and unhelpful and just intended to fan some flames (see, I can jump
>>to conclusions, too).  If you are really intent on taking people to
>>task, then please use the cygwin-talk mailing list.

Once again, Eli, if you are intent on continuing this, I am asking you
to take your speculation about my motives, impropriety, or Corinna's
actions to the cygwin-talk list.  Or, you could just let this drop.

Please do me the courtesy of doing one or the other and avoiding further
discussion in this list.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -