X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: cp command fails when copying from a network drive
Date:	Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:39:13 -0000
Message-ID:	<003801c70f26$4a379900$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<20061123165628.GA32515@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 23 November 2006 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Nov 23 16:41, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 23 November 2006 15:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> 
>>> On Nov 23 11:52, John Cooper wrote:
>>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>  > Can you please make an experiment?  Just call `ls -i' a couple of
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, the inode numbers do differ:
>>> 
>>> Yeah, that was expected.  Thanks for confirming.
>>> 
>>> I can't stop wondering what people thin when implementing "random" file
>>> ids resp. inode numbers.  Stuff like that should be reported back to
>>> manufacturer *hint* *hint*
>> 
>>   We have a netapp here, and it doesn't do that at all.
>> 
>>   John, do you have the netapp 'SecureShare' software installed on the PC
>> you're using?
> 
> Dave, can you please send the getvolinfo output for this netapp so that
> we can look if it's using the same flags?

@_______. .
(       /"\
 ||--||(___)
 '"  '"'---'
/artimi/software/firmware $ ./getvolinfo.exe  /win/t
rootdir: T:\
Volume Name        : <CIFS.HOMEDIR>
Serial Number      : 0
Max Filenamelength : 255
Filesystemname     : <FAT>
Flags:
  FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH  : TRUE
  FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES   : TRUE
  FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK        : TRUE
  FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS        : FALSE
  FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION       : FALSE
  FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS          : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES  : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
  FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED   : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS    : FALSE
  FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION    : FALSE
  FILE_NAMED_STREAMS          : TRUE
  FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME       : FALSE
@_______. .
(       /"\
 ||--||(___)
 '"  '"'---'


> This reminds me of the situation we have with older and newer Samba
> versions.  John and Dave, I have no experience with this netapp stuff
> and I also have no access to it.  Could you both please somehow compare
> whether this might be a version problem or actually a complete different
> product?  We should have some data points before making a decision in
> favor of or against using the real inode numbers.

  This is all the version info that I could find.


  Software version:  Data ONTAP Release 7.2.
  NetApp Release 7.2: Mon Jul 31 15:51:19 PDT 2006
  Model 	FAS250

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -