X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<45635474.2010605@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:33:08 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060916 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin > 1.5.18-1 fails on network and removable drives
References:	<003201c70da1$66897a50$0b00000a AT Wampum>
In-Reply-To:	<003201c70da1$66897a50$0b00000a@Wampum>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Ken Turner wrote:
> Versions of "cygwin" up to 1.5.18-1 have worked just fine for me (Windows XP).
> All later versions fail to work for me as follows:
> 
>   o Attempts to list ("ls") network drives (Windows shares) fail with
>   "permission denied". My home folder is a network drive supported by SMB; this
>   is supported by a Unix server running TAS. Cygwin 1.5.18-1 and earlier work
>   just fine with CYGWIN=ntsec. I have tried all combinations of
>   "(no)ntsec"/"(no)smbntsec"/"(no)ntea" with later versions of Cygwin, but I
>   alwasy get "permission denied".
> 
>   o Attempts to access removable drives (e.g. floppy, USB memory) behave
>   bizarrely. I either see "permission denied" or I see the raw device when I try
>   to list the contents. I discovered that unsetting "ntea" solves this problem,
>   perhaps because these external drives are FAT and not NTFS. But setting "ntea"
>   wasn't a problem until I progressed beyond Cygwin 1.5.18-1.
> 
> I can't find anything on the archives that seems to address this, and I've
> exhausted all the things I can think of. Something significant seems to have
> changed in Cygwin about six months ago. Any thoughts? Thanks!
> 

Perhaps have a look at the strace output (and compare before and after if
necessary).  Maybe <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00532.html> has
some relevance, though I realize there are some significant differences.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -