delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Christopher Faylor-2 wrote: > > I'm not sure if you got my point or not but if you don't develop an > installer which deals with categories and dependencies, then I don't see > how it could be considered a replacement for setup.exe. If you do this, > then you don't need to list all of the packages in "Base". You just > need to know that there is a "Base" and deal with that. > You've been carrying this axe to grind for a long time. Why not accept that you're dealing with a different paradigm and get off your pretentious high horse? FYI -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7124766 Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |