Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/10/30/14:47:44
Could be, but I would wager his problems stem from not having the
current folder (dot) in his path...
J
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 19:44 +0000, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
> From:
> DePriest, Jason R.
> <jrdepriest AT gmail DOT com>
> To:
> cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject:
> Re: sh files
> Date:
> Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:44:15 +0000
> (14:44 EST)
>
>
> > On 10/30/06, dubcek <> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Eric. Unfortunately, your remedy did not work. As I mentioned
> in my
> > original mail, all my .sh files were made under unix. But I tried
> d2u anyway
> > (you never know), but I got the same result.
>
> What does a hex view of your shell script say the line ending are?
>
> For example, I have a working script and my line endings are \x0A
>
> My Windows-y scripts all have \x0D\x0A
>
> You can try u2d, then d2u to see if that can clean up wonky line
> endings.
>
> > Here is an example of one of my unsophisticated .sh files; it was
> intended
> > to clean up after a latex session:
> > rm *.div *.aux *.log
>
> rm is actually in your path, yes?
>
> > when I run the clean.sh (this was the name I gave to it), I get the
> 'command
> > not found' error reply.
>
> This is the same error you get when bash doesn't understand the line
> endings. What sort of mount (binary vs. text) are your shells scripts
> on?
>
> What shell do you run? The stuff we are talking about is all bash.
>
> You may also want to observe http://cygwin.com/problems.html so you
> can send the appropriate attachment to the list to give folks the
> information they need to help you.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -