X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:42:18 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin NTFS permission listing oddness.
Message-ID:	<20061030094218.GK8323@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<45453F71 DOT 5040309 AT tlinx DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<45453F71.5040309@tlinx.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Oct 29 15:55, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I was messing with my theme libs and noted the following differences in
> how CYGWIN displays the attributes and Groups:
> -rwx------+ 1 Administrators None           214K Aug  7  2004 uxtheme.dll*
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 Administrators SYSTEM         214K Aug  4  2004 
> uxtheme.dll-old*
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 Administrators Administrators 214K Aug  4  2004 uxtheme.old*
> 
> [...]
> 
> More importantly, they all seem to have the same ACL's attached:
> /windows/system32> xcacls uxtheme\*
> C:\windows\system32\uxtheme.dll BUILTIN\Administrators:F
>                                BUILTIN\Power Users:C
>                                NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:F
>                                BUILTIN\Users:R
> C:\windows\system32\uxtheme.dll-old BUILTIN\Administrators:F
>                                    BUILTIN\Power Users:C
>                                    NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:F
>                                    BUILTIN\Users:R
> C:\windows\system32\uxtheme.old BUILTIN\Administrators:F
>                                BUILTIN\Power Users:C
>                                NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:F
>                                BUILTIN\Users:R
> [...]
> I thought Cygwin derived it's user/group/permissions from the NT security
> settings.  Is this not the case? 

I don't understand the question.  Did you actually compare the (x)cacls
output with the ls output?  It makes perfect sense, given especially
that xcacls only prints the ACL, not owner and group of the file.
Unfortunately I don't know any Windows system tool which prints the
group information given in the security descriptor.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -