X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com>
Subject:	Re: costly accurate link counts, Vista compat...(was Re: questions about excessive disk usage when doing tab completion)
Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:22:41 -0500
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<ehlb41$j6c$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<453AAF44 DOT 4040201 AT 666 DOT com> <453AB8FD DOT 3030209 AT byu DOT net> <453BB9AD DOT 7010505 AT tlinx DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To:	<453BB9AD.7010505@tlinx.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Linda Walsh wrote:
> Of course Cygwin is already faster than MS's own POSIX subsystem;
> Such compatibility may be one reason why MS dropped future revisions
> of their Interix (POSIX) subsystem support.  I wonder if it even
> runs on Vista?  For that matter, anyone tried Cygwin to see if there are 
> any compatibility issues for Cygwin on Vista?

Eh? That would be news to me. Last I heard it had become "SUA" (Services 
for UNIX-based Applications) and was a core component of Windows.

But it still sucks. :-)

-- 
Matthew
Only Joe suffers from schizophrenia. The rest of us enjoy it.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -