delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:26:31 +0200 (MET DST) |
From: | Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Snapshot 20061023, ghostscript and xdvi |
Message-ID: | <Pine.OSF.4.21.0610231915270.30771-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Sorry, I don't see any difference. In both cases, cygwin 1.5.21 and > current from CVS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and in a previous replay: > $ uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 cathi 1.7.0(0.160/4/2) 2006-10-23 17:00 i686 Cygwin ^^^^^ What you see is correct but I observe those problems with the snapshot 1.7.0(0.160/4/2) 2006-10-23 08:34:32 ^^^^^^^^ I haven't yet tried the current (it isn't yet listed at http://cygwin.com/snapshots/). Regarding: > $ cd /bin > $ mv gs.exe gs.exe.orig > $ ln -sf /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe gs.exe > $ ls -l gs.exe* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 corinna Users 21 Oct 23 17:25 gs.exe -> >/usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe > -rwxr-x---+ 1 corinna Users 4507648 Feb 15 2006 gs.exe.orig.exe with coreutils-5.97-1 I have $ cd /bin $ mv gs.exe gs.exe.orig $ ls -l gs.exe* ... -rwxr-x---+ 1 Angelo Users 4507648 Feb 15 2006 gs.exe.orig and not gs.exe.orig.exe ! Cheers, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |