X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:40:58 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Can't preview postscript files under xdvi
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.21.0610162334360.6249-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall wrote:

> As I recall, the reason for have a no-X version was so that people don't
> have to install X to use ghostscript.

I do not remember that on Linux there are X and no-X of ghostscript.

If Cygwin aims to reproduce Linux on Windows who installs Cygwin should
also installs a minimum of X.

In any case having two similar package seems confusing and, as the lists
show, we have some troubles.


Cheers,

   Angelo.  


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -