delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/10/12/17:20:28

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:20:11 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: shopt igncr not working
Message-ID: <20061012212011.GA8535@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1160655422743 DOT antti DOT nospam DOT 1605718 DOT wGO_WJ9D1NlId3tB-z6Qig AT luukku DOT com> <20061012123406 DOT GA30908 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <452EA386 DOT 9010201 AT qualcomm DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <452EA386.9010201@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:20:22PM -0700, Rob Walker wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:17:02PM +0300, Antti Tyrv?inen wrote:
>>  
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>Installed latest cygwin and I met problems with bash and scripts which 
>>>are in DOS format.
>>>
>>>$ bash --version
>>>GNU bash, version 3.1.17(9)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
>>>Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>>
>>>I read the mailing lists and I also tried to add ' shopt -s igncr;#' in 
>>>the beginning of the script, but it didn't work.  In my opinion, this is 
>>>bad solution if I have to edit all my existing scripts.
>>>
>>>All works fine with bash 3.1.6.
>>>
>>>What I should do?
>>>
>>>a) install bash 3.1.6 and wait for new
>>>b) install bash 3.1.9. and convert all my scripts to UNIX format
>>>    
>>
>>b), i.e., use the tool the way it was designed to be used.
>  
>Saying cygwin's bash wasn't designed to handle CRLF is a lot like
>saying that cygwin's bash (as previously released all these years)
>wasn't designed to work with the rest of Windows.  This might actually
>be the case, but I don't understand the point.  If you don't want to
>work with Windows, why release for Windows?

So, why were you asking for help if you weren't going to actually avail
yourself of it?

You can read the first few paragraphs of the Cygwin web site for
information about what Cygwin is.

>Many, many other cross-platform products make allowances for CRLF
>(version control systems are a prime example) to maximize
>compatibility, and thereby their usefulness, on Windows.  Cygwin's
>recent changes (with make and bash) here has put a real crimp in my
>plans to depend on cygwin for a portable build environment.
>
>Just curious, is there a goal or strategy that drives changes like
>this?

You may not have been paying attention but this has already been
explained a few times.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019