X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<452D24CE.2040703@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:07:26 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060916 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.5.21-2: ssh-add unable to connect to ssh-agent with McAfee installed
References:	<452C2879 DOT 9070406 AT cdvinc DOT com> <egh9v8$d5o$3 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <452C3C33 DOT 7050306 AT cygwin DOT com> <egj2s6$kml$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<egj2s6$kml$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

mwoehlke wrote:
> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> mwoehlke wrote:
>>> Tim Beuman wrote:
>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>> The "Ridiculous amount of stuff" was sent out as atachments but I 
>>>> guess somehow it ended up inline. Sorry for that.
>>>
>>> Um... Huh. Thunderbird shows it as attachment. The web archive does 
>>> not. Anyone that knows the mailer software have a guess what went wrong?
>>
>> Look at the raw message:
>>
>> <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=cygwin&date=2006-10&msgid=452C15C2.4060800%40cdvinc.com> 
> 
> 
> Not that I'm especially familiar with what I'm looking at, but that 
> looked OK to me. Do *you* know who's dropping the ball here? Is Tim's 
> mailer doing something funny or is the archiver not processing the 
> message correctly? (I'm asking because either one should probably be 
> looked into, although given that Thunderbird had no problems and the raw 
> message looks OK to my eyeballs, it seems like the archiver ought to be 
> handling this better than it obviously is.)
> 
> (Since this is rather OT, is there a better place to discuss possible 
> shortcomings of the mail archiver?)
> 

I don't see a problem with the original message sent or the one received
(here - I see the same as what was sent - also using TB).  As to how it's
displayed in the archives, you can take that up with the overlords at
sourceware.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -