X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:04:03 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ImageMagick needs old X dlls - lyx/XmGrace fail because ImageMagick doesn't work
Message-ID:	<20061009200403.GB31128@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<452AA3B3 DOT 8030303 AT scytek DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<452AA3B3.8030303@scytek.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:32:03PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>This is merely a reminder that some packages fail because the current
>Xorg version removed some dlls that are needed by ImageMagick.
>
>This is not a new issue, see here:
>
><http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-08/msg00052.html>
>
><http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-10/msg00236.html>

In absence of a maintainer for X or ImageMagick, the only likely
response from this kind of "reminder" is an annoyed sigh.

Or was this possibly a heads up that you were going to be taking over
one or the other package?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -