X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	mwoehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com>
Subject:	Re: API versus web interface for public document access
Date:	Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:39:40 -0500
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<egdqfs$vbg$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<20061008165118 DOT GA13342 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <BAY108-F190F48FC603E071E9CB9E5BE110 AT phx DOT gbl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To:	<BAY108-F190F48FC603E071E9CB9E5BE110@phx.gbl>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Mike Marchywka wrote:
> Thanks, I've been on the list before and I do recall some related
> success stories. Any suggestions for a more appropriate audience?

Since your question (which I read, after skimming through to find it at 
the bottom of your post) seems to relate generically to scripting, maybe 
a scripting forum (of which I do not know any to recommend). And, if you 
do find another audience, I would strongly recommend that you omit the 
background and post just the question, or at *bare* minimum have the 
question first, followed by all the examples.

-- 
Matthew
"Try to bring it back in one piece this time." -- Q (MI6)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -