X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-3.1-9
Date:	Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:28:13 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<loom.20061003T182214-991@post.gmane.org>
References:	<announce DOT 4521DE28 DOT 5070301 AT byu DOT net> <efttfn$5rm$2 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

mwoehlke <mwoehlke <at> tibco.com> writes:

> 
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > Second, this release adds a new shopt, igncr, which dynamically
> > tells bash to ignore all \r in the input file when it is set; however, it
> > defaults to unset.
> 
> So, I keep wanting to know if you are thinking about submitting this 
> upstream (or have you done so already?)...
> 

I'm hoping to port the patches to the 3.2 beta before proposing them upstream 
(right now, my cygwin TODO list includes: get coreutils 6.3 stable ported to 
cygwin, get bash 3.2beta ported to cygwin as experimental, post bash patches 
upstream, update bash-completion to use cygport and add some long overdue 
promised completion functions for cygwin).  As written, my patch is 
conditionalized on __CYGWIN__, but when proposing it upstream, I will try to 
make it more generic.

-- 
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -