| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <451D5451.9030608@ucsd.edu> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:13:53 -0700 |
| From: | Larry Breyer <lbreyer AT ucsd DOT edu> |
| User-Agent: | Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| CC: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: bash 3.1.18 seems seriously broken |
| References: | <451AEBAE DOT 6000703 AT cs DOT ucsd DOT edu> <451B1F43 DOT 1030400 AT byu DOT net> |
| In-Reply-To: | <451B1F43.1030400@byu.net> |
| X-Greylisting: | NO DELAY (Trusted relay host); processed by UCSD_GL-v2.1 on mailbox7.ucsd.edu; Fri, 29 September 2006 10:13:59 -0700 (PDT) |
| X-MailScanner: | PASSED (v1.2.8 78315 k8THDwN2047146 mailbox7.ucsd.edu) |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Eric Blake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Larry Breyer on 9/27/2006 3:22 PM:
>> What changed from bash 3.1.17 to 3.1.18 ?
>
> I don't know, but let me know when you find out :)
> (There is no 3.1.18 - the latest official bash is 3.1.17, at cygwin
> release 8, but upstream is very unlikely to release 3.1.18 since 3.2 is in
> beta now.)
>
I am a bit confused by these numbering schemes. When I look at the
'Select Packages' section of setup, my choices for bash are 3.1-6 or
3.1-8. I assumed they were shorthand for 3.1.16 and 3.1.18.
>>
>> I got syntax errors on blank lines.
>
> That means your script has CRLF line endings, but resides on a binary
> mount point.
I think I panicked slightly at discovering Cygwin bash had been
regressed. I was thinking of all the supplied scripts so I ran
a test of the ~450 shell scripts and found only a handful with CR
embedded:
/bin/card
/bin/fixps
/bin/flea
/bin/makempx
/bin/mktexlsr
/bin/nfs-server-config
/etc/postinstall/uw-imap-imapd.sh.don
/etc/postinstall/xerces-c-devel.sh.done
/etc/preremove/gv.sh
/etc/preremove/uw-imap-imapd.sh
/etc/preremove/X-start-menu-icons.sh.done
/etc/preremove/xerces-c-devel.sh
I found several of the scripts I wrote had embedded CRs. I'm an
old Unix hand, so I am really baffled how they got into my scripts.
Plus, I always found vim would display the CRs as ^M. To my dismay
I now discover the vim silently ignores CR when its part of CR-LF
pair, unlike LF-CR.
So, I have subscribed to cygwin and cygwin-announce. I am hopeful I
will not be surprised again.
--
Larry Breyer
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |