X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4517D3A4.6070809@princeton.edu>
Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:03:32 -0400
From:	Vinod Gupta <vinod AT Princeton DOT EDU>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Speeding up Cygwin deployment
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> >> C:\cygwin\usr\share\man\man1\allec.1
> >> C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\lib\X11\doc\html\atobm.1.html
>
> I don't have a system against which to check this conjecture, but if 
> you do a DOS attrib on each of these files my guess is that the first 
> is created as a +R symlink and the second as a +S symlink*; and if you 
> do a DOS dir the first will be revealed as a .lnk file and the second 
> will not. It looks to me as though the zipper you're using understands 
> and can re-create files of the first sort, but the second goes wrong.
>
> (Or maybe even +S +H which might help explain its invisibility, but 
> don't think so.)
>
> For different but similar reasons (the need to copy an entire Cygwin 
> system to other file systems via a DVD which can faithfully transfer 
> +R but not +S files whilst preserving these attributes) I have gone 
> through the system re-creating all original +S symlinks as +R. If the 
> above conjecture is true / looks as though it might be true, and if 
> you think this re-creation might help I can send you the script. Fergus

You are right. The first file has R and the second one has S attrib set. 
So, I guess your script to change all the S attribs to R should work for 
me too. Could you please send it to me.

I am wondering:
Why would they set these html files as System files?
Why info-zip (or probably any DOS app) can't restore them??
Why WinXP's internal unzipper goes an order of magnitude slower if the 
archive has S files???

Thanks,
Vinod


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -