X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 5 Sep 2006 21:39:21 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Variation on: regular user, bash cannot find /tmp
Message-ID:	<20060906013921.GA6397@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<000801c6d14c$886e2f80$8b092918 AT TheMorningLight> <44FE23D2 DOT 60903 AT aim DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<44FE23D2.60903@aim.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:26:42PM -0400, Charli Li wrote:
>Could I get a new acronym over here?  PCYMTSTRTFTTCML (Please Configure
>Your Mailer To Set The Reply-To Field To The Cygwin Mailing List).

I don't see any reason for this.  If people actually *want* this, then they
should set the Reply-To.  If it was mailing list policy then I'd just set the
Reply-To automatically.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -